Right to Repair in the Micromobility Space

The right to repair movement has been in the spotlight for years, but it gained significant popularity and momentum with Apple's controversial decision in 2017 to restrict access to repair manuals, parts, and diagnostic tools for its devices. But what has this movement looked like in the micromobility space? With the high price tag of these systems, many are calling for manufacturers to extend this principle to micromobility, advocating for greater accessibility to repair resources, transparency in diagnostics, and standardized repair protocols; while others are voicing concerns about safety risks with making these systems more user-repairable.

First, lets take a look at what reparability looks like for an average micromobility system. Unlike traditional consumer electronics, micromobility devices such as electric scooters and e-bikes present a unique set of challenges when it comes to maintenance and repair. These compact yet intricately designed systems encompass a diverse range of components, from electric motors and battery packs to control electronics and connectivity modules. Repairing such systems often requires specialized knowledge, tools, and access to proprietary diagnostic interfaces. To make matters worse, parts to repair these systems are particularly hard to come by with some manufacturers requiring license’s just to purchase these parts.

So what are the main goals of the right to repair movement in the Micromobility space?

• Accessibility to Repair Resources: Ensuring that micromobility users and repair professionals have access to comprehensive repair manuals, spare parts, and diagnostic tools, reducing dependency on manufacturers for repairs.

• Transparency in Diagnostics: Promoting clear and user-friendly diagnostic interfaces within micromobility systems, empowering users to identify and address issues, thereby extending the lifespan of their vehicles.

• Standardized Repair Protocols: Establishing industry-wide standards for repairing micromobility devices, streamlining repair processes, and reducing costs for both users and independent repair shops.

• Environmental Sustainability: Fostering a culture of sustainability by enabling users to repair and maintain their micromobility systems, reducing electronic waste and minimizing the environmental impact of disposable transportation devices.

• Consumer Choice: Providing users with the freedom to choose where and how they maintain their micromobility devices, promoting a competitive repair market and enhancing consumer agency in their mobility choices.

What are the concerns being voiced with the push for right to repair in Micromobility?

• Safety Risks: Some argue that making micromobility systems more user-repairable may lead to safety risks if repairs are not performed correctly. As we’ve talked about previously, many of the fires caused by micromobility system were due to improper repair.

• Quality Control: Manufacturers argue that maintaining control over repairs allows them to ensure consistent quality and safety standards. They express concerns that third-party repairs may not meet these standards, potentially tarnishing their brand reputation.

• Consumer Education: Critics of the right to repair movement in micromobility worry that many users lack the knowledge and skills required for complex repairs. They emphasize the importance of proper training and education to mitigate risks associated with user repairs.

What has the response of manufacturers been?

Manufacturers of micromobility systems have responded to the right to repair movement with a mixture of approaches and perspectives. While some manufacturers have taken steps to address the movement's demands, others have remained cautious. Responses have included:

• Limited Accessibility: Some manufacturers have started offering limited access to repair manuals, spare parts, and diagnostic tools for their micromobility systems, recognizing the growing consumer demand for repairability.

• Commitments to Standardization: Prominent manufacturers have made commitments to provide standardized diagnostic tools, fostering consistency in repairs and reducing reliance on proprietary equipment.

• Push for recycling over repair: Many manufacturers have been pushing to be exempt from right to repair legislature, while advocating for recycling of their systems.

Some questions to think about:

• What challenges do users face when attempting to repair micromobility systems, and how do these challenges compare to those in other industries like consumer electronics and automobiles?

• To what extent does the right to repair movement align with the principles of sustainability and reduced electronic waste in the micromobility industry?

• How can manufacturers and advocacy groups work together to strike a balance between user reparability and product safety in micromobility systems?

• What lessons can be learned from the right to repair movement's experiences in other industries, and how can these insights inform the movement's goals in micromobility?

• How can consumer education and training programs be integrated into the right to repair movement in micromobility to ensure safe and effective repairs by users and technicians alike?

Stay tuned for our next post! Next we plan to touch on the Formula One race in Austin, and explore the many micromobility ride sharing systems across the city.

Make sure to share your comments on this week's article and tell us what you'd like to see in our next post on LinkedIn.